I don't think "the right thing" is as black-and-white here as it is in other recalls. The article mentions several confounding factors: - the airbags were manu

I don't think "the right thing" is as black-and-white here as it is in other recalls. The article mentions several confounding factors: - the airbags were manufactured in different locations over the course of 18 years, making it difficult to say that 100% of them need to be recalled - it's not easy to prove what caused the issue in the first place - the vehicle manufacturer should probably be the party responsible for the recall, not the airbag manufacturer (based on US law, not based on common sense) So fighting this is certainly a self-interest of the airbag company, but it's not necessarily baseless.