I do appreciate there can be such a distinction! The article was using them interchangeably and therefore so was I. The reply to my comment hewed to the technic

I do appreciate there can be such a distinction! The article was using them interchangeably and therefore so was I. The reply to my comment hewed to the technical version, so I replied with the pop-ethics version. Perhaps I should have made it more clear that I was not saying “there isn’t a technical version”, but rather “there is also a popular version, and that’s what seems to be in use here”.