4 ms·
I don't know what your definition of "cheap" is, but a brand new Kia Rio is $17k base. That would be approximately $4.5k in 1980, or just a bit higher than a ba
by AlotOfReading 3y ago
I don't know what your definition of "cheap" is, but a brand new Kia Rio is $17k base. That would be approximately $4.5k in 1980, or just a bit higher than a base Pinto.
The problem with "simple" is that everyone uses a different definition and there's a dramatic asymmetry in how people treat missing vs extraneous features. You probably won't reject a vehicle for having Bluetooth, but many people won't buy a car without it for example. A simple car also won't convert someone who wants a truck, nor will it convert the person who wants to fix it in his garage with only a wrench set because it still has to comply with safety and efficiency regs that require electronics.
Another issue is that you're not actually paying the full development cost of your vehicle. Development costs are amortized over multiple trims, models, platforms, and even manufacturers. It's likely that a "simpler" vehicle would wind up costing more due to more custom development and fewer economies of scale.
- everdrive 3y agoEven in the last 10 years, new car prices have skewed higher. It’s not as if there are _zero_ cheap cars left, but the field is heavily narrowed. We almost had a cheap pickup truck, but 1) it’s got a 4.5’ bed, and 2) no one can actually buy one. WRT to simplicity, I hear you. Given modern regulations and cost margins it may not be possible to see a simple, basic car or truck ever again. I’m not suggesting this is the manufacturer’s fault, but simply that they’re not offering anything I want to buy.