4 ms·
Wouldn't the onus be on the controller manufacturers to ensure compatibility?
by lmpdev 3y ago
Wouldn't the onus be on the controller manufacturers to ensure compatibility?
- honkycat 3y agoBitwig is extremely niche. Waiting around for controller manufacturers to implement isn't going to happen.
- prmoustache 3y agoPush is made by Ableton. I am not sure they are willing to help a company build by some of their ex developer who left them to build a new DAW with possibly stolen code and at least many ideas that were discussed internally. Despite the headquarters proximity, I think they are not the best friends.
- easyThrowaway 3y agoNot so sure about the "stolen" part. Bitwig code has a completely different code base (Java backend with UI written using Juce), and the sentiment at the time was that a few devs were frustrated by Ableton management rejecting several proposals that ultimately were implemented in Bitwig. Also the multitake tracks UI that was implemented in Live 11 is basically a (slightly improved) copy of the same feature on Bitwig.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- earthnail 3y agoThe stolen part mostly relates around the sales and distribution network, less around the code. Basically the sales equivalent of IP theft, and a really huge douche move by their CEO. Makes him very unsympathetic to me. Not as bad as Behringer but close.
- enqk 3y agoI think it's the other way around, the Bitwig UI is what appears to be coded in Java.