3 ms·
> The claim was that unions would be an improvement. You do understand that something can have a similar base, but one is better in other areas, right? Surely
by krainboltgreene 3y ago
> The claim was that unions would be an improvement.
You do understand that something can have a similar base, but one is better in other areas, right? Surely you get that and you just forgot.
- AnthonyMouse 3y agoThey can also be worse in other areas too, right? And we were talking about this one area. But the same logic generalizes. If you're in the minority then the union doesn't care about your concerns and if you're in the majority then the company does regardless of the union because it costs them too much to not.