I didn't think it was FUD, but the article did confuse me so maybe it was just poorly written (or I suck). Here's what I read: Title: Warming of blackouts if

I didn't think it was FUD, but the article did confuse me so maybe it was just poorly written (or I suck). Here's what I read: Title: Warming of blackouts if wind, sun added to grid [note: I think this was supposed to be "warning"] Opener: Adding electricity from the wind and the sun could increase the frequency of blackouts and reduce the reliability of the nation's electrical grid, an industry report says. Body: The North American Electric Reliability Corp. says in a report scheduled for release today that unless appropriate measures are taken to improve transmission of electricity, rules reducing carbon dioxide emissions by utilities could impair the reliability of the power grid. They went from warning about alternatives to discussing issues with emission reduction rules. Those two weren't connected in the article, so maybe I'm just not up on SF legislation. Am I to understand that the emission reduction rules mandate the use of some solar and wind and that the result of that could impair reliability because of the swings you mentioned (not mentioned in the article)? Help :-)