> The fundamental problem seems to be that it's still slightly sub-GPT-3.5-quality It really depends on what you use it for. I've found Claude better than GPT

> The fundamental problem seems to be that it's still slightly sub-GPT-3.5-quality It really depends on what you use it for. I've found Claude better than GPT4 and even Claude+ at creative writing. It also tends to give more comprehensive explanations without additional prompting. So I prefer to have it, rather than GPT3.5 or 4, explain things to me. It's also free, which is another big win over GPT4.