3 ms·
OMG brings to mind the competing tech: Processor Independent Netware that was to run on Intel, PPC, MIPS, Alpha, SPARC and PA-RISC. I'm lucky that clusterfuck
by gumby 4y ago
OMG brings to mind the competing tech: Processor Independent Netware that was to run on Intel, PPC, MIPS, Alpha, SPARC and PA-RISC. I'm lucky that clusterfuck didn't take years off my life and I apologize to my colleagues who had to spend so much time on it.
The Wikipedia Netware page laconically mentions all the architectures that it supposedly "ran" on but really it never shipped in production beyond the 368.
- lproven 4y agoThat's a product which seems to have dropped off the World Wide Web. I remember seeing a demonstration of it running on PowerPC at a trade show, but that's the only time I ever saw it running. Most webpages that mention it today just redirect to a definition of the word "pin". It's a bit of a shame -- it was a clever idea, but I think that Novell overestimated the desirability of Netware to corporate clients at that point in time. As a Netware admin at the time, I think the real killer opportunity that Novell missed was Netware for OS/2. That gave them a real nondedicated Netware 4 server using early 1990s technology, which could've been a web server or an email server or whatever you needed using OS/2 binaries in the background alongside the industry beating performance of Netware at that time, but instead Novell decided to go it alone and wasted a huge amount of time and effort on making Netware 5 and 6 into products capable of running their own native binaries meaning that they re-implemented half of UNIX into what had been a tiny, sleek, dedicated file and print server.
- yuhong 3y ago[dead]