4 ms·
just in terms of pure randomness (which is not what this is testing), random(random()) doesn't make more sense than random(). If your random number generator is
by fsckboy 3y ago
just in terms of pure randomness (which is not what this is testing), random(random()) doesn't make more sense than random(). If your random number generator is good, one is enough. If it's not good, multiple times is not going to help.
I'm putting this in the past tense, it randumb enough times for me.
- the_af 3y agoThe argument to random() in this case is the upper bound, so `random()` and `random(random())` are different. See: https://processing.org/reference/random_.html https://processing.org/reference/random_.html