2 ms·
Checkout the Chinese Room thought experiment, in essence - you can't really prove it either way, the argument becomes what is the definition of thought. Mass-me
by thewataccount 3y ago
Checkout the Chinese Room thought experiment, in essence - you can't really prove it either way, the argument becomes what is the definition of thought. Mass-memorization to the point of passing as logic/thought may or may not count as actual thought.
I'm in the camp that until it can do arbitrary math like (23942+323432)/5 without an agent then it's not capable of thought. I'll admit it's ability to program, and that training it to code also improves it's "english/human language" logic is interesting.
- sharemywin 3y agoThey might have already added agents behind the scenes or maybe you just need to ask it give you the exact answer. I don't know. ChatGPT4 USER I you needed to get the exact answer to this problem how would you approach this? (23942+323432)/5 ASSISTANT To get the exact answer for this problem, follow these steps: 1. Add the two numbers: 23942 + 323432 = 347374 2. Divide the sum by 5: 347374 ÷ 5 = 69474.8 ChatGPT3.5: USER I you needed to get the exact answer to this problem how would you approach this? (23942+323432)/5 ASSISTANT To get the exact answer to this problem, you would perform the following steps: 1. Add 23942 and 323432: 23942 + 323432 = 347374 2. Divide the result by 5: 347374 / 5 = 69474.8 Therefore, the exact answer to the problem (23942+323432)/5 is 69474.8. when I ask 3.5 this: USER what is the answer to (23942+323432)/5? ASSISTANT The answer is 68974.
- thewataccount 3y agoWoah I think you're right. It's output looks suspiciously like Chain of thought too https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03262 https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03262 Here's a question - do we consider the intelligence of the model itself, or do we consider the possible intelligence of the entire system including agents? Because yeah if it can decide when it should chain stuff together then it's getting interesting.