4 ms·
If we're adding detail to the story because we think the reader might not be aware of why there weren't many bison left, I'm not sure: > Bison had become nearl
by yamtaddle 3y ago
If we're adding detail to the story because we think the reader might not be aware of why there weren't many bison left, I'm not sure:
> Bison had become nearly extinct due to genocide by European settlers
is going to help. Any reader who'd benefit from specifying why bison had been largely wiped out, probably won't connect the dots here, and will instead read that as genocide against bison. Readers who read "genocide" as referring to "genocide against indigenous people, part of which was eradication of bison" didn't need any of this called out to begin with.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- smcl 3y agoI don't think it's right to hold a comment on HN to the same standards as a magazine article, though. It's entirely possible to write that sentence you had a problem with in a way that describes what happened without any confusion.