As does forced WFH for some people (minus the climate aspects). Or unskillfully conducted WFH (even when everyone agrees in principle). I think it's pretty cl

As does forced WFH for some people (minus the climate aspects). Or unskillfully conducted WFH (even when everyone agrees in principle). I think it's pretty clear that this is a topic that people have organic, gut-level differences of opinion on -- and not without a very substantial basis (thinking here of the experience of people who hate WFH and find it to be as damaging to their mental health as others find it to be liberating). I'm still in the camp that holds that on balance there are more benefits to WFH, and fewer downsides - provided everyone is on board. But what's needed to bridge the divide is more empathy for the other side - not a bullet to the head of everyone who disagrees with us.