4 ms·
I keep hearing these kind of arguments about in-depth reporting being costly. Vice went bankrupt when it stopped producing those stories. Per https://en.wikip
by araes 3y ago
I keep hearing these kind of arguments about in-depth reporting being costly.
Vice went bankrupt when it stopped producing those stories.
Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_Media https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_Media in 2016, Vice was making $1B ($10^9) with 3000 employees. ~$330,000 / employee. Can probably afford some plane flights and investigative telephone calls.
Per standard work year, every employee's 'supposedly' working 2080 hrs a year. ~6M work hours. You can write a lot of interesting stories, and follow a lot of leads other people are not looking at with 6M hours / year.
If you follow the "copy sensational click" route, you end up with a lot of local media, where it looks like somebody just copied the local police arrest report.
You don't stand out by just copying / dopplegangering whatever looks shiny.
- yafbum 3y agoSometimes (not sure if this what happened here) an organization that works well oversells growth to its investors, and the only way to reach growth is to juice metrics in the most mechanical way possible, destroying what made the organization add value in the first place.