4 ms·
Unfortunately, in the message I was responding to, you were (1) accusing another user of gross ignorance, while (2) in regard to the subject matter, demonstrati
by lisasays 3y ago
Unfortunately, in the message I was responding to, you were (1) accusing another user of gross ignorance, while (2) in regard to the subject matter, demonstrating extremely superficial (basically inadequate) knowledge of you were talking about.
So you were provided with a necessary correction. To be frank, I'm not sure what other kind of response you were expecting.
- MichaelZuo 3y ago> To be frank, I'm not sure what other kind of response you were expecting. One that follows all the HN rules and guidelines. The majority of passing readers disagree with the alleged reading considering that they have not saw fit to downvote my previous comments. So I think it's fair to say this is mostly, or entirely, in your own imagination. To put it in a different way: Imputing intentions to another HN user can at best cause an account's legitimacy, credibility, veracity, etc., to remain the same. It's not possible for it to be boosted. And given the already moderately suspicious nature of a pseudonymous 69 day old account with so much karma, it's far more likely to reduce it.