3 ms·
> There is no call for wanting fsync per message, it is an anti pattern and isn’t done because it isn’t necessary 1. Don't have to do it by message 2. It's us
by dilyevsky 3y ago
> There is no call for wanting fsync per message, it is an anti pattern and isn’t done because it isn’t necessary
1. Don't have to do it by message
2. It's used by many distributed db engines, kafka and (i think) zk are the outliers here, not the other way around
- eternalban 3y agoKafka is not a "db engine". zk is a "db engine" in the same way 'DNS' is a "db engine".
- ahachete 3y agoOh, DNS is definitely a database engine [1] ;) [1]: https://dyna53.io https://dyna53.io
- dilyevsky 3y agoAh yes, the semantic argument. Fyi - pulsar and etcd do use fsync
- eternalban 3y agoNo one is arguing with you. You were making an argument based on a misinformed software category assertion and the error was pointed out. So r/fyi/til maybe?