5 ms·

Check out Grover Norquist and his goals -- this tax hell is intentional.

petsfed 3y ago
This sounds kind of like a conspiracy-theory, so it's worth providing a source. Norquist himself, and his organization Americans for Tax Reform, believe that making tax payers go through the process of preparing their tax return forces us to audit our comfortability with paying taxes[0],[1]. If, on the other hand, we just signed off on numbers that the IRS provided us every April, we'd be less aware of, and therefore less likely to protest, increases in taxes. This isn't a subtle, arguably-the-cruelty-is-the-point sort of situation, this is a I'm-not-using-anesthetic-because-I'm-concerned-you-aren't-sufficiently-afraid-of-the-thresher-that-just-cut-your-foot-off-when-I-ran-you-over-with-it. I'm not a big fan of paying taxes, and I don't like it when my taxes go up. But I already feel that when I look at my paystub, or pay property taxes. The whole effort to make tax returns harder so people hate taxes hinges on the idea that most people are completely unaware of taxes until April 15th rolls around. It's cynical in the extreme, and that's really off-putting to me. 0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Tax_Reform#Opposition_to_free_automatic_tax_return_filing_and_other_efforts_to_make_tax_filing_easier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Tax_Reform#Oppos... 1. https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/taxreformpanel/meetings/meeting-05172005.html https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/taxreformpanel/meetings/meet...
- koolba 3y ago
  > But I already feel that when I look at my paystub, or pay property taxes. Unless you’re cutting a check in person you’re arguably not feeling it as much as you should. It’s like how replacing cash toll booths with electronic debit hides the true price you’re paying on the highway.
  - jcranmer 3y ago
    I doubt very many people know how much taxes they actually paid in 2022, even after the pain of filling out taxes. Instead, the number they know and remember is the size of the refund check (or the tax check they have to send out) in April. And the size of that check has relatively little to do with your actual tax rate, instead being driven by the withholding tables instead.
    - koolba 3y ago
      That’s exactly my point. If people were cutting a check for the full about in one go, they’d have a better handle on the size of it. Likely a different opinion as well. Having to at least see the numbers rather than blindly clicking “Yes” on a government run website is not quite there but it’s better than nothing.
    - eppsilon 3y ago
      It might be nice if the IRS provided a summary of what you paid + your effective tax rate in a prominent place on the first page of your tax return. Maybe they could include last year's info for comparison. If we ever reach a point where the IRS just tells you what they think you owe, they could include the same summary to placate the Norquist types (who undoubtedly will then start complaining about something else).
  - petsfed 3y ago
    I already feel it when I see the number every 2 weeks on my paycheck. Or when I'm advised of my property tax bill every 3 months. Or register a car. Or buy something at a physical store. Taxes are everywhere, and you have to work really hard to stay ignorant of how much they're taking out of your pocket. Literally all Norquist is doing is making it so for about 2 weeks a year, what little free time I have after the kids are down for the night is spent in tense almost-argument with my wife as we seek out all the places our employers have secreted the tax documents they already provided to the IRS. Its such a colossal, pointless waste of time for people who have a simple tax situation. I have never, not once, looked at the numbers produced by performing my tax return (which, again, the IRS already performs so they can double check my numbers) and thought "Thank you Grover Norquist for keeping me aware of how much my government is costing me!". Because I am already made aware of that when I get my very first paycheck from a new job. Speaking of toll booths vs electronic debit, when I lived in the Bay Area, I had to commute from east bay to west bay every day. For the first 4-5 months, I was paying cash, because in my scant spare time, I hadn't had time to get transponder and direct debit set up. I was paying $35/week. I didn't become less aware of that cost when I switched to the transponder, because the actual cost was time. Time is something I have very little of, so adding friction just wastes my most limited resource. Using my most limited resource to make sure I'm aware of how the government might be using slightly too much of my like 10th most limited resource is a waste of my fucking time. Thus, I'm angry not at the government for potentially wasting my money, but at Grover Norquist for wasting my time because he thinks I'm too fucking stupid to realize what's happening.
    - astrange 3y ago
      > Because I am already made aware of that when I get my very first paycheck from a new job. Taxes don't reduce your purchasing power insofar as everyone else also has to pay them, so your relative amount of post-tax money is the same, and the tax system is progressive, meaning your relative position is actually a little better. Remember, money isn't real. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_illusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_illusion
    - koolba 3y ago
      > Speaking of toll booths vs electronic debit, when I lived in the Bay Area, I had to commute from east bay to west bay every day. For the first 4-5 months, I was paying cash, because in my scant spare time, I hadn't had time to get transponder and direct debit set up. I was paying $35/week. I didn't become less aware of that cost when I switched to the transponder, because the actual cost was time. Time is something I have very little of, so adding friction just wastes my most limited resource. You just proved my point without even realizing it. When you were forced to pay cash, they were forced to show you the price. You even remember the amount now, presumably years later. If they could have you pay cash without seeing the price I’m sure they would. If the price had changed from week to week, you’d immediately realize it because the amounts you’d interact with would change. But that’s only possible with a purely digital system. As all the numbers happen behind the scenes. Ask yourself this, why don’t any of those automated toll booths show the amount you “auto paid” rather than just “Ok!” Or “Paid!”? It’s because they explicitly do not want people to know what they are paying so they can raise the rates with minimal flak.
refurb 3y ago
Disagree. You don't need Grover to make US taxes overly complex and burdensome. Just look at some of the tax bills Democrats have sponsored - vague tax rules that the IRS is responsible for implementing (and often making their own decisions on how to implement). Basically new tax rules are put into place with little regard on making them simple or including data collection as a part of the tax change.
- pstuart 3y ago
  The last time we were given "tax reform" it was mainly about cutting rates for the wealthy rather than streamline and modernize how taxes are handled (the IRS budget has been constrained and prevents them doing anything other than barely function, which is a not an accident). https://www.policygenius.com/taxes/who-benefited-most-from-the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act/ https://www.policygenius.com/taxes/who-benefited-most-from-t...
  - refurb 3y ago
    "Middle-class Americans saw mixed results as most of the benefits accrued to the highest earners." I mean, yeah? 42% of Americans pay no federal income tax, how could tax reform benefit them unless it's handing out cash? Which we already do with EITC. And the complexities and burden of the tax system go way, way back before Trump's tax reform. Think more like anything passed since the 1950's.
    - pstuart 3y ago
      > You don't need Grover to make US taxes overly complex and burdensome. Just look at some of the tax bills Democrats have sponsored You went out of your way to make this about partisan finger-pointing and I merely countered that there's plenty of blame to share. Way to deflect and spin! Partisan politics is why the subject is so rancorous. I have no party affiliation and am happy to acknowledge and criticize the one that I am most sympathetic too. This is why we can't have nice things -- because we can't talk about policy and and government reform without it becoming a pissing match.

This sounds kind of like a conspiracy-theory, so it's worth providing a source. Norquist himself, and his organization Americans for Tax Reform, believe that making tax payers go through the process of preparing their tax return forces us to audit our comfortability with paying taxes[0],[1]. If, on the other hand, we just signed off on numbers that the IRS provided us every April, we'd be less aware of, and therefore less likely to protest, increases in taxes. This isn't a subtle, arguably-the-cruelty-is-the-point sort of situation, this is a I'm-not-using-anesthetic-because-I'm-concerned-you-aren't-sufficiently-afraid-of-the-thresher-that-just-cut-your-foot-off-when-I-ran-you-over-with-it. I'm not a big fan of paying taxes, and I don't like it when my taxes go up. But I already feel that when I look at my paystub, or pay property taxes. The whole effort to make tax returns harder so people hate taxes hinges on the idea that most people are completely unaware of taxes until April 15th rolls around. It's cynical in the extreme, and that's really off-putting to me. 0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Tax_Reform#Opposition_to_free_automatic_tax_return_filing_and_other_efforts_to_make_tax_filing_easier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Tax_Reform#Oppos... 1. https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/taxreformpanel/meetings/meeting-05172005.html https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/taxreformpanel/meetings/meet...

koolba 3y ago
> But I already feel that when I look at my paystub, or pay property taxes. Unless you’re cutting a check in person you’re arguably not feeling it as much as you should. It’s like how replacing cash toll booths with electronic debit hides the true price you’re paying on the highway.
- jcranmer 3y ago
  I doubt very many people know how much taxes they actually paid in 2022, even after the pain of filling out taxes. Instead, the number they know and remember is the size of the refund check (or the tax check they have to send out) in April. And the size of that check has relatively little to do with your actual tax rate, instead being driven by the withholding tables instead.
  - koolba 3y ago
    That’s exactly my point. If people were cutting a check for the full about in one go, they’d have a better handle on the size of it. Likely a different opinion as well. Having to at least see the numbers rather than blindly clicking “Yes” on a government run website is not quite there but it’s better than nothing.
  - eppsilon 3y ago
    It might be nice if the IRS provided a summary of what you paid + your effective tax rate in a prominent place on the first page of your tax return. Maybe they could include last year's info for comparison. If we ever reach a point where the IRS just tells you what they think you owe, they could include the same summary to placate the Norquist types (who undoubtedly will then start complaining about something else).
- petsfed 3y ago
  I already feel it when I see the number every 2 weeks on my paycheck. Or when I'm advised of my property tax bill every 3 months. Or register a car. Or buy something at a physical store. Taxes are everywhere, and you have to work really hard to stay ignorant of how much they're taking out of your pocket. Literally all Norquist is doing is making it so for about 2 weeks a year, what little free time I have after the kids are down for the night is spent in tense almost-argument with my wife as we seek out all the places our employers have secreted the tax documents they already provided to the IRS. Its such a colossal, pointless waste of time for people who have a simple tax situation. I have never, not once, looked at the numbers produced by performing my tax return (which, again, the IRS already performs so they can double check my numbers) and thought "Thank you Grover Norquist for keeping me aware of how much my government is costing me!". Because I am already made aware of that when I get my very first paycheck from a new job. Speaking of toll booths vs electronic debit, when I lived in the Bay Area, I had to commute from east bay to west bay every day. For the first 4-5 months, I was paying cash, because in my scant spare time, I hadn't had time to get transponder and direct debit set up. I was paying $35/week. I didn't become less aware of that cost when I switched to the transponder, because the actual cost was time. Time is something I have very little of, so adding friction just wastes my most limited resource. Using my most limited resource to make sure I'm aware of how the government might be using slightly too much of my like 10th most limited resource is a waste of my fucking time. Thus, I'm angry not at the government for potentially wasting my money, but at Grover Norquist for wasting my time because he thinks I'm too fucking stupid to realize what's happening.
  - astrange 3y ago
    > Because I am already made aware of that when I get my very first paycheck from a new job. Taxes don't reduce your purchasing power insofar as everyone else also has to pay them, so your relative amount of post-tax money is the same, and the tax system is progressive, meaning your relative position is actually a little better. Remember, money isn't real. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_illusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_illusion
  - koolba 3y ago
    > Speaking of toll booths vs electronic debit, when I lived in the Bay Area, I had to commute from east bay to west bay every day. For the first 4-5 months, I was paying cash, because in my scant spare time, I hadn't had time to get transponder and direct debit set up. I was paying $35/week. I didn't become less aware of that cost when I switched to the transponder, because the actual cost was time. Time is something I have very little of, so adding friction just wastes my most limited resource. You just proved my point without even realizing it. When you were forced to pay cash, they were forced to show you the price. You even remember the amount now, presumably years later. If they could have you pay cash without seeing the price I’m sure they would. If the price had changed from week to week, you’d immediately realize it because the amounts you’d interact with would change. But that’s only possible with a purely digital system. As all the numbers happen behind the scenes. Ask yourself this, why don’t any of those automated toll booths show the amount you “auto paid” rather than just “Ok!” Or “Paid!”? It’s because they explicitly do not want people to know what they are paying so they can raise the rates with minimal flak.

refurb 3y ago

Disagree. You don't need Grover to make US taxes overly complex and burdensome. Just look at some of the tax bills Democrats have sponsored - vague tax rules that the IRS is responsible for implementing (and often making their own decisions on how to implement). Basically new tax rules are put into place with little regard on making them simple or including data collection as a part of the tax change.

pstuart 3y ago
The last time we were given "tax reform" it was mainly about cutting rates for the wealthy rather than streamline and modernize how taxes are handled (the IRS budget has been constrained and prevents them doing anything other than barely function, which is a not an accident). https://www.policygenius.com/taxes/who-benefited-most-from-the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act/ https://www.policygenius.com/taxes/who-benefited-most-from-t...
- refurb 3y ago
  "Middle-class Americans saw mixed results as most of the benefits accrued to the highest earners." I mean, yeah? 42% of Americans pay no federal income tax, how could tax reform benefit them unless it's handing out cash? Which we already do with EITC. And the complexities and burden of the tax system go way, way back before Trump's tax reform. Think more like anything passed since the 1950's.
  - pstuart 3y ago
    > You don't need Grover to make US taxes overly complex and burdensome. Just look at some of the tax bills Democrats have sponsored You went out of your way to make this about partisan finger-pointing and I merely countered that there's plenty of blame to share. Way to deflect and spin! Partisan politics is why the subject is so rancorous. I have no party affiliation and am happy to acknowledge and criticize the one that I am most sympathetic too. This is why we can't have nice things -- because we can't talk about policy and and government reform without it becoming a pissing match.