One of the editors gave a form in which the newer research could be presented that was in compliance with their policy (the green sky blue sky example). Why did

One of the editors gave a form in which the newer research could be presented that was in compliance with their policy (the green sky blue sky example). Why didn't the author make an edit of his form? Something like: "Although most historians agree that little evidence was presented... newer research suggests..." It would get the new point across while keeping the prior, possibly fallacious, but accepted viewpoint visible.