3 ms·
I'm guessing the original commenter was confused between heating with gas and cooking. Using electricity for cooking is much more efficient when using inductio
by danhor 3y ago
I'm guessing the original commenter was confused between heating with gas and cooking.
Using electricity for cooking is much more efficient when using induction heating (which is the only kind of electric cooking anyone should use). Cooking with gas might be very efficient in converting gas to heat, but more than half of the heat gets lost without heating the pot/food and escapes by the side (approx. 40%), so using induction is about twice as efficient as using a gas stove (and conventional electric stoves aren't much worse). With the typical efficiency of a combined cycle gas plant, this cancels out to be approx. the same but gets better when more renewables are used (and, of course, worse with coal).
Gas stoves still do have a lot of other valid issues and I am kind of amazed a culture war broke out over it (when e.g. in germany less than 10% of households use gas stoves without a massive demand for new gas stoves).
> and allowed for propane tanks at new single family homes that really want a gas stove
As far as I can tell from the reporting [1] this is stopping new gas hookups (maybe including the equipment at the time of construction?) but there seems to be at least nothing stopping you from adding a gas stove and powering it from propane. I was unfortunately unable to find the text in the bill (or the exact bill), but as far as I can tell nothing suggests otherwise and if that is the case:
> That would have preempted 90% of the valid criticism.
That doesn't seem to have happened
[1]: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/new-york-state-bans-natural-gas-some-new-construction-2023-05-03/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/new-york-state-bans-natural...
- mindslight 3y agoPoint taken about heat getting into food versus going up the side of the pot, but the break even still ties into my point that the real gains are still forward-looking rather than immediate. > I am kind of amazed a culture war broke out over [gas stoves] Hah. I am very not surprised. A seemingly-harmless everyday item in people's homes that the "big government" is "taking away"? There's certainly valid top-down arguments about the indoor air quality in the inefficient rental market, but they don't apply to single family homes (in the US paradigm it's fundamentally a personal choice). > I was unfortunately unable to find the text in the bill (or the exact bill) Same here, which is doubly unfortunate with all of these more-heat-than-light topics where the "news" articles drown out the primary sources. Some of my digging did indicate that propane was included, but it's hard to know if that was just a hallucination (in the large language model sense, regardless of whether the articles were written by silicon LLMs). I know personally if I just had to have a gas stove in new construction, I'd get a few 20 pound propane tanks and plumb it myself. I actually considered doing this if I wanted a gas stove (versus paying a monthly fee for municipal gas), but ultimately decided against gas because the less flammable stuff in the house the better (moving appliances with those flex lines always gives me the willies as I think about metal fatigue). But solving your own problems isn't really relevant in the culture war...