2 ms·
Was this reply intended for a comment? The documentation page linked doesn’t make any claims about or comparisons to other solutions, to the best that I can det
by altairprime 3y ago
Was this reply intended for a comment? The documentation page linked doesn’t make any claims about or comparisons to other solutions, to the best that I can determine, and so it’s unclear to me what statement this is in reply to.
- CharlesW 3y ago> Was this reply intended for a comment? No, I'm just asking why there's interest around Sixel when there are protocols (like iTerm's Inline Images Protocol) that use standards-based image formats. I'm not a heavy terminal user and don't see much value for images in my CLI, so one very possible explanation is that I don't understand the use cases where this "interesting" format (without a guaranteed pixel aspect ratio, as I understand it) shines.