4 ms·
I agree with your assertion that there is a big difference here, in that anti-abortion protestors are far more likely to resort to domestic terrorism to get the
by luma 3y ago
I agree with your assertion that there is a big difference here, in that anti-abortion protestors are far more likely to resort to domestic terrorism to get their way.
Pro-choice protestors don't have a history of bombing health clinics, that's something reserved for the people you claim "take peaceful action". History has something quite different to say: https://www.vox.com/2015/12/1/9827886/abortion-clinic-attacks-mapped https://www.vox.com/2015/12/1/9827886/abortion-clinic-attack...
- keneda7 3y agoAccording to the FBI director this is not true. Since Dobbs 70% of violence has been against pro life centers. Skip to 1:45 in the video for the exact quote. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pro-life-centers-targeted-70-abortion-related-violent-threats-dobbs-decision-fbi https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pro-life-centers-targeted-7...
- iudqnolq 3y agoYou're using the wrong metric. Pro abortion protestors broke a large number of windows. Anti abortion protestors shot a handful of people. The appropriate comparison is not number of incidents.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- vorpalhex 3y agohttps://www.nationalreview.com/news/pro-abortion-terrorists-firebomb-buffalo-pro-life-pregnancy-center/ https://www.nationalreview.com/news/pro-abortion-terrorists-... No, both sides have a good history of bombings. "My side bombs less" is also not a wonderful counterargument. It would be preferable if the two sides could quietly engage in a melee battle somewhere away from bystanders. In the meantime, maybe we can avoid ideological battles on HN.