> dicotomy falacy Not at all. I'm not stating that smog is fine. I'm only stating the obvious: overall quality of life is more important than smog. It's obvio

> dicotomy falacy Not at all. I'm not stating that smog is fine. I'm only stating the obvious: overall quality of life is more important than smog. It's obvious, too, that no smog can increase quality of life, depending on the associated costs.