5 ms·

UFO flying Mach 10 near plane

5 points by graderjs 3y ago

timonoko 3y ago
Art Bell explained it all. Those bloody aliens can distort time and space. Aliens are everywhere but we cannot see them. But cats can see them. Cats often stare intensely in to empty space. The remote viewing expert in Art Bells program (major Ed Dames?) told us that if you stare little bit aside at the same spot, you can sometimes see small cigar-shaped object with a propeller or antenna on both ends. In you peripheral view that is. They are indeed quite tiny maybe one american footsie in length. If you have no idea of the distance, you can misjudge the speed of these objects.
- jansan 3y ago
  I assume it's fake, but you can see it pass through the cloud and distort it (hats of for the extra effort). So it is as far away as the cloud, which makes the object pretty fast.
  - BulgarianIdiot 3y ago
    Even if I abstract myself from the UFO claim, clues it's likely fake: 1. Zero motion blur despite monstrous speed (there's no such thing as zero-length shutter speed). This seems shot with phone, as well, but no rolling shutter, either. 2. Cloud puff doesn't track well the camera movement & the rest of the cloud (may be compression artifact). 3. Despite the puff (showing the cloud is affected), the rest of the cloud changes no shape, seemingly.
    - graderjs 3y ago
      It's funny, because 1000s of people saw these things in the late 1940s in USA, and they didn't think they were fake: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Kr1TwKhQk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Kr1TwKhQk About the motion blur, it's good point, but what if it "moves" by skipping to discrete points, rather than moving continuously? That could explain it.
      - zimpenfish 3y ago
        > what if it "moves" by skipping to discrete points, The laws of physics would like a word.
        graderjs 3y ago
        Yeah, current publicly known laws of physics. Laws discovered by Man, who's imperfect and flawed and apt to be scared of what he doesn't know and think anything outside of that is impossible. Also apt to greedily conceal that which would either give him advantage or make him look bad through ignorance or lack of control. So...Galileo would like a word. :) ;p xx ;p
        krapp 3y ago
        You're going to need more than hubris and Youtube videos if you want to prove Einstein a fool.
        graderjs 3y ago
        Well, son, you’re gonna need more than a quaint turn of phrase to make fools of all of the thousands of observations and observers over the decades. If you don’t think so or that sounds unreasonable to you, I suggest you please now take a seat right now watch that entire YouTube video (the phenomenon) and write up for me your criticism and we can discuss further part by part. Don’t you think it’s hubris of man to assume he’s already got it all figured out and therefore, because he cannot reconcile these observations with his pet theories, The observations must be doubted? But yes thanks for coming back to seek out to reply this almost invisibly unpopular thread. Such as suggested here must be so dangerous to your worldview as to require you discover and reply it, to ensure that such a challenge does not go unanswered, as even out of sight, Such a powerful suggestion would be an intolerable nagging doubt in your mind that would threaten to unravel everything you hold dear and depend upon for your daily existence. Am i right?
        krapp 3y ago
LinuxBender 3y ago
If anyone has issues saving that video with yt-dlp [1] due to filename length, use the option -o "%(title).150B [%(id)s].%(ext)s" There are probably better options but this worked [1] - https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/releases https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/releases
King-Aaron 3y ago
Yeahhhh that looks like classic home-brew vfx to me.

5 points by graderjs 3y ago

Art Bell explained it all. Those bloody aliens can distort time and space. Aliens are everywhere but we cannot see them. But cats can see them. Cats often stare intensely in to empty space. The remote viewing expert in Art Bells program (major Ed Dames?) told us that if you stare little bit aside at the same spot, you can sometimes see small cigar-shaped object with a propeller or antenna on both ends. In you peripheral view that is. They are indeed quite tiny maybe one american footsie in length. If you have no idea of the distance, you can misjudge the speed of these objects.

jansan 3y ago
I assume it's fake, but you can see it pass through the cloud and distort it (hats of for the extra effort). So it is as far away as the cloud, which makes the object pretty fast.
- BulgarianIdiot 3y ago
  Even if I abstract myself from the UFO claim, clues it's likely fake: 1. Zero motion blur despite monstrous speed (there's no such thing as zero-length shutter speed). This seems shot with phone, as well, but no rolling shutter, either. 2. Cloud puff doesn't track well the camera movement & the rest of the cloud (may be compression artifact). 3. Despite the puff (showing the cloud is affected), the rest of the cloud changes no shape, seemingly.
  - graderjs 3y ago
    It's funny, because 1000s of people saw these things in the late 1940s in USA, and they didn't think they were fake: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Kr1TwKhQk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Kr1TwKhQk About the motion blur, it's good point, but what if it "moves" by skipping to discrete points, rather than moving continuously? That could explain it.
    - zimpenfish 3y ago
      > what if it "moves" by skipping to discrete points, The laws of physics would like a word.
      - graderjs 3y ago
        Yeah, current publicly known laws of physics. Laws discovered by Man, who's imperfect and flawed and apt to be scared of what he doesn't know and think anything outside of that is impossible. Also apt to greedily conceal that which would either give him advantage or make him look bad through ignorance or lack of control. So...Galileo would like a word. :) ;p xx ;p
        krapp 3y ago
        You're going to need more than hubris and Youtube videos if you want to prove Einstein a fool.
        graderjs 3y ago
        Well, son, you’re gonna need more than a quaint turn of phrase to make fools of all of the thousands of observations and observers over the decades. If you don’t think so or that sounds unreasonable to you, I suggest you please now take a seat right now watch that entire YouTube video (the phenomenon) and write up for me your criticism and we can discuss further part by part. Don’t you think it’s hubris of man to assume he’s already got it all figured out and therefore, because he cannot reconcile these observations with his pet theories, The observations must be doubted? But yes thanks for coming back to seek out to reply this almost invisibly unpopular thread. Such as suggested here must be so dangerous to your worldview as to require you discover and reply it, to ensure that such a challenge does not go unanswered, as even out of sight, Such a powerful suggestion would be an intolerable nagging doubt in your mind that would threaten to unravel everything you hold dear and depend upon for your daily existence. Am i right?
        krapp 3y ago

LinuxBender 3y ago

If anyone has issues saving that video with yt-dlp [1] due to filename length, use the option -o "%(title).150B [%(id)s].%(ext)s" There are probably better options but this worked [1] - https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/releases https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/releases

King-Aaron 3y ago

Yeahhhh that looks like classic home-brew vfx to me.