4 ms·

Remember what they did to Naomi Wu (aka. SexyCyborg / https://www.youtube.com/@Naomi-Wu https://www.youtube.com/@Naomi-Wu). Vice's behaviour was unethical at b

by oger 3y ago

Remember what they did to Naomi Wu (aka. SexyCyborg / https://www.youtube.com/@Naomi-Wu https://www.youtube.com/@Naomi-Wu). Vice's behaviour was unethical at best and Naomi - who is a wonderful tech content creator - got into significant trouble putting her business at serious risk. Why would you do that as a "journalist"? https://medium.com/@therealsexycyborg/shenzhen-tech-girl-naomi-wu-my-experience-with-sarah-jeong-jason-koebler-and-vice-magazine-3f4a32fda9b5 https://medium.com/@therealsexycyborg/shenzhen-tech-girl-nao...

poppytaker 3y ago
What a weird plug for Naomi, who for the most part is represented by her partner Timaz. Don't forget they (Naomi and timaz) tried to metoo Ltt. The journalist you are referring to now works at the verge, fyi
- oger 3y ago
  It’s from the time when she was truly annoyed by this episode.
  - poppytaker 3y ago
    I dislike Sarah jeong but she covered it here https://twitter.com/sarahjeong/status/981558161566920704?s=19 https://twitter.com/sarahjeong/status/981558161566920704?s=1... If you believe "naomi" then you have been duped by her American husband, timaz.
pimlottc 3y ago
That's a long read, can you provide a summary? I've never heard about this.
- oger 3y ago
  [flagged]
  - nh23423fefe 3y ago
    Saying "remember what they did" is content free. You couldve just said it.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- phreack 3y ago
  Apparently, she spent some days with Vice journalists and showed them around for an article, believing due to some documents they'd sent that they would not inquire or publish anything about her personal relationships, and when they were back they started asking about some Reddit theories about her marriage status. She implies that kind of publicity into her private affairs is incredibly dangerous to her life and can't even specify why without exposing herself to that danger, so she immediately attempted to find out and stop what Vice was going to publish without any luck. This snowballed into a long online fight where major name journalists would tweet at her but not reply to her, making her feel desperate and leading to the Medium posts compiling a bit of her story during all this.
blastersyndrome 3y ago
[flagged]
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

by oger 3y ago

poppytaker 3y ago

What a weird plug for Naomi, who for the most part is represented by her partner Timaz. Don't forget they (Naomi and timaz) tried to metoo Ltt. The journalist you are referring to now works at the verge, fyi

oger 3y ago
It’s from the time when she was truly annoyed by this episode.
- poppytaker 3y ago
  I dislike Sarah jeong but she covered it here https://twitter.com/sarahjeong/status/981558161566920704?s=19 https://twitter.com/sarahjeong/status/981558161566920704?s=1... If you believe "naomi" then you have been duped by her American husband, timaz.

pimlottc 3y ago

That's a long read, can you provide a summary? I've never heard about this.

oger 3y ago
[flagged]
- nh23423fefe 3y ago
  Saying "remember what they did" is content free. You couldve just said it.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
phreack 3y ago
Apparently, she spent some days with Vice journalists and showed them around for an article, believing due to some documents they'd sent that they would not inquire or publish anything about her personal relationships, and when they were back they started asking about some Reddit theories about her marriage status. She implies that kind of publicity into her private affairs is incredibly dangerous to her life and can't even specify why without exposing herself to that danger, so she immediately attempted to find out and stop what Vice was going to publish without any luck. This snowballed into a long online fight where major name journalists would tweet at her but not reply to her, making her feel desperate and leading to the Medium posts compiling a bit of her story during all this.

blastersyndrome 3y ago

[flagged]

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]