4 ms·
Let me rephrase this "Mom Blogs put links to Gambling Sites to get their readers, especially new Mothers, hooked to Gambling" Sure, BIG Gambling Company is bad
by testHNac 3y ago
Let me rephrase this "Mom Blogs put links to Gambling Sites to get their readers, especially new Mothers, hooked to Gambling"
Sure, BIG Gambling Company is bad.
But the so called 'mom blogs' have no ethics and decency for doing this.
If I were a reader, I might not trust the Gambling Company but I have a relationship ( as a reader ) with the Mom Blog owner.
And it's that person who has abused our relationship.
The outrage should be directed more at these women ( I assume ) who are basically predators preying on new mothers who might be at an emotionally vulnerable stage of their lives.
- ranting-moth 3y agoOf course "mom blogs" has no ethics. But when you bait/pay/bribe people to do bad things, it's surprising how many "good people" turn bad. The real perpetrator is of course the one who pays people to do bad things.
- HPsquared 3y agoBoth are guilty.
- etothepii 3y agoAre we sure that they were "mum blogs". Hooke have lost the SEO game to such an extent that it's almost always stack overflow clones rather than stack overflow. I would not be surprised to discover that these "mum blogs" were nothing if the sort.