4 ms·
> Why would people suddenly need to take up childcare? ...that's what immediately struck me as weird as well about the article. It seems to be presuming that
by stakhanov 3y ago
> Why would people suddenly need to take up childcare?
...that's what immediately struck me as weird as well about the article. It seems to be presuming that raising young children while simultaneously doing a fulltime WFH job would sort of naturally be a position that an employee would now find themselves in.
Elsewhere in this thread, the question of whether or not that's possible is being hotly debated. But, be that as it may, I would expect that, if this does occur, it would occur by agreement between employer and employee and with some sort of accommodation around lost productivity.
But, maybe, the actual substance of the matter is that Dell allowed its people to WFH and now all of those couples that could previously have only one breadwinner due to having small children are suddenly drawing two fulltime salaries due to combining WFH with parenting responsibilities. If that's actually the case, then I kind of agree that there's a real problem there, but would contend that it's only tangentially related to WFH.
- OJFord 3y agoHuge mounds of salt because I'm not a parent - but I have colleagues that do that and it's never bothered me, I suppose I assume it's more a risk of interruption than it is stopping you putting the hours in at all. If someone was a strict '9-5' (or whatever) type and also had child(ren) interrupting or distracting them, then yeah, that's taking the mick a bit. But otherwise, it's not like I don't answer the door or empty the dishwasher or whatever.
- wan23 3y agoVery young children obviously require a great deal of care, but somewhat older children might get dropped off by the school bus at 3 PM and then occupy themselves for a few hours at home with an adult present.