4 ms·
This is very off-topic and for that I apologize, but can anyone shed some light on why so many texts of this era use 2 backticks/graves as a left double quote a
by hunter2_ 3y ago
This is very off-topic and for that I apologize, but can anyone shed some light on why so many texts of this era use 2 backticks/graves as a left double quote and 2 apostrophes (neutral single quotes) as a double right quote?
I could understand using neutral single quotes all around if the double quote character wasn't available, but why the backticks? I get that they look more out of place with proportional fonts than fixed-width, but even when fixed-width was ubiquitous and even if this usage of glyphs looked symmetrical, it would've deviated from how the code points are defined, right? Or were the definitions so multi-valued (like the "hyphen/minus" character) that this was legitimate?
- joeman1000 3y agoI think this is necessary for quotes in LaTeX. Could also be the same for something horrible that ESR would use, like `troff` or `groff`.
- gerikson 3y agoIt's also a convention in GNU Info.
- tom_ 3y agoSome discussion here: https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/quotes.html https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/quotes.html
- hunter2_ 3y agoBrilliant, thanks. Even a brief mention of hyphen-minus!