3 ms·
I'm curious what those would be in the modern era? The "non-PC" x86 chips I can think of: 80186/188 - Sort of predates the IBM hegemony, can be hammered into
by hakfoo 3y ago
I'm curious what those would be in the modern era?
The "non-PC" x86 chips I can think of:
80186/188 - Sort of predates the IBM hegemony, can be hammered into shape by adding replacements for onboard peripherals
80376 - a failed long-gone experiment
386CX/EX - not entirely sure how incompatible they are
Xeon Phi/Larrabee/Knight's Corner designs -- not really SoCs so much as special purpose acceleratirs.
- fathyb 3y agoI think the Moorefield and Merrifield SOC platforms are not PC compatible?
- userbinator 3y agoAlso these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Quark https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Quark They are basically a 486 pipeline with some Pentium instructions. Unfortunately it seems Intel didn't realise that x86 without the PC legacy is worth little, so their attempts at non-PC x86 have mostly failed. On the other hand, "PC-on-a-chip" SoCs like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex86 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex86 have enjoyed more popularity.
- Narishma 3y agoThe PS4 (and probably PS5 as well) use x86 chips but are not PC-compatible.