4 ms·
Dishonesty in this case is simple; its fraud, everyone knows how to deal with fraud even big business. This is just propaganda meant to get people back to the
by than3 3y ago
Dishonesty in this case is simple; its fraud, everyone knows how to deal with fraud even big business.
This is just propaganda meant to get people back to the office, poorly veiled propaganda at that.
If the person signed conflicting agreements and violated those agreements; its pretty clear what the lawyers will say to do. It will be one of those moments that seems like out of a sitcom, with a joke waiting but the response is more serious... "this is what we are going to do, you are lucky that is all we are going to do".
If the work gets done and you aren't in violation of agreements there is nothing wrong with working multiple jobs especially when as a CEO of a larger company you've participated in suppressing worker wages.