4 ms·

wrt to the NYT specifically, it was an intentional top down decision https://twitter.com/KelseyTuoc/status/1588231892792328192 https://twitter.com/KelseyTuoc/s

by rcpt 3y ago

wrt to the NYT specifically, it was an intentional top down decision https://twitter.com/KelseyTuoc/status/1588231892792328192 https://twitter.com/KelseyTuoc/status/1588231892792328192 Context: https://web.archive.org/web/20221104205605/https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1588190763413868553 https://web.archive.org/web/20221104205605/https://twitter.c...

comeonbro 3y ago
I'm surprised that the article didn't mention this, given the company the author apparently keeps I would have thought he'd have been among the criminally few people who witnessed and is aware of it, and it's both narratively aligned and the single most important piece of background information.
- rcpt 3y ago
  I left a comment on his post (I think, substack commenting is a bit confusing)
- erikto 3y ago
  Oh I forgot that one. Good catch.
tacticalturtle 3y ago
Does anyone know why the original tweet was deleted by Matthew Yglesias? From some cursory searches, I haven’t been able to find a specific reason like a retraction, and it doesn’t look like he did a general wipe of his history around 2022.