3 ms·
I think we agree, but I'm not sure I get your last point. PHP, for all its (in parts very weird) flaws, always had the advantage of how fast it is to get a webs
by codeflo 3y ago
I think we agree, but I'm not sure I get your last point. PHP, for all its (in parts very weird) flaws, always had the advantage of how fast it is to get a website up and running. But AFAICT, VB.net isn't actually any easier to get running than C# is?
- ocdtrekkie 3y agoThere's actually a bunch of features in the VB library that aren't in C# out of the box that make building stuff with VB a bit faster.
- ethbr0 3y agoAgreed. VB.NET does have some weirdly useful built in functionality, that isn't in C#. From memory, date and string stuff?
- ocdtrekkie 3y agoThat's in there, but the entire My namespace is VB-specific. A ton of things like using settings and log providers that are basically prefab in VB, but you have to set up custom in C#.