2 ms·
That is because there isn’t such thing as a “clear neutral” perspective, and to expect someone to deliver one to you and bitch about it when they don’t is irrat
by LastTrain 3y ago
That is because there isn’t such thing as a “clear neutral” perspective, and to expect someone to deliver one to you and bitch about it when they don’t is irrational. Moderation is a balance of concerns and Wikipedia has struck about the best balance I’ve seen from a large org.
- joenot443 3y agoConsidering "neutrality" is literally one of the three policies of Wikipedia, I don't think it's very irrational for one to expect that to be delivered. Its mention seems to have struck a nerve with you though, for that I apologize, I certainly didn't come here with the intention to "bitch" about your favorite large org :)