3 ms·

Euarchontoglira would be a way less researched and relevant branch of life have it not produced us humans. Same thing that if sentient birds were to appear, th

Euarchontoglira would be a way less researched and relevant branch of life have it not produced us humans. Same thing that if sentient birds were to appear, they will consider dinosaur epoch never ended, just had a setback and useful bottleneck.

sandworm101 3y ago
>> way less researched and relevant branch of life have it not produced us humans. I doubt that any branch would have been even studied in any way had not euarchontoglira produced us humans. I doubt many other animals are even aware of evolution as a concept.
AtlasBarfed 3y ago
>> sentient birds have you seen the problem solving of crows? edit: vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gui3IswQ0DI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gui3IswQ0DI
- thriftwy 3y ago
  Where can I read any science written by crows?
  - bckr 3y ago
    I think you’re not using “sentience” in the same way as each other. I recommend avoiding “sentience” in this thread and being more specific about what you mean.
jjtheblunt 3y ago
Are African Greys sentient bird examples?
- thriftwy 3y ago
  Did they manage to build and publish an evolution tree?
  - jjtheblunt 3y ago
    I think that’s beyond the meaning of sentient.
    - Xorakios 3y ago
      "sentient" is often used casually when "sapient" is meant don't whether that's country-level language variation, an example of language evolution ;), or just sloppiness.
      - thriftwy 3y ago
        "Sapient" is a stupid term because a Denisovian or Neanderthal were likely able to produce a piece of research with some assistance, while being a Homo {not Sapient}.