2 ms·
While I don't doubt that chatGPT is better than the current alternatives, the fact that the author use the 20$/month version and not the free version (or both)
by poulpy123 3y ago
While I don't doubt that chatGPT is better than the current alternatives, the fact that the author use the 20$/month version and not the free version (or both) to compare to bard is not very great. The same for giving the same value to paying 20$/month and knowing the model used
- gremlinsinc 3y agowell, being as this is a comparison of bard using palm2 and gpt4, the free version which is gpt3.5 wouldn't suffice. I'd like to see them add in bing chat, phind.com and perplexity, and one of the open source models.