3 ms·
Sure. That's why I mentioned multiple ways in which the article could have been relevant to TPUs, which you chose not to quote. But it didn't have any of those
by jsnell 3y ago
Sure. That's why I mentioned multiple ways in which the article could have been relevant to TPUs, which you chose not to quote. But it didn't have any of those either. The sentence you're offering up as a demonstration is just something you made up that does not appear in the article.
If anything, this just reinforces the point I was making. There is nothing at all in the article supporting this narrative. So, where is this coming from? Why are you so intent on this idea that you're reduced to fabricating support for it?
- danielmarkbruce 3y agoThe comment quoted you, then made an analogy. Where is the fabrication?
- onion2k 3y agoAt the very least we know that there's a team in Google that chose to build an AI supercomputer with non-Google hardware. They didn't, or wouldn't, work with the TPU team to do it, or they did and the TPU team couldn't get it to work. Or they could but something still made nVidia hardware more compelling. Every level of management involved were persuaded that this was the case even knowing it would send a message to people outside of Google about TPUs. Andnfrom.all that we're meant to say it infers nothing about TPUs?