3 ms·
Yes, RoR is a different and larger beast than Ruby. It also does not optimize "mainly that code should be beautiful English prose." You can import the joyful
by nullstyle 3y ago
Yes, RoR is a different and larger beast than Ruby. It also does not optimize "mainly that code should be beautiful English prose."
You can import the joyful drive of Ruby into your RoR codebases. I've worked on plenty of rails codebases that were a pleasure to work in. Far more than any other web framework I've worked with.
- berkes 3y agoI consider e.g. 'scope' to just be (slightly harder to test and follow) over a class method. I consider a concerns to be more complex and unexpected versions of a Module. I consider "render @foo" to be just an incomprehensible version of the explicit "render_partial("the_name", ...)" And so on. All of these have bitten me many times, oft in production even. Many of these caused me and my step debugger hours of wading though deep stacks of method-missing or runtime code definitions.