4 ms·

This is absolute hyperbole. Does the U.S. not have a Supreme Court, and indeed other courts, for interpreting legislation?

• rad_gruchalski 3y ago
  US is not EU. Both US and UK use a different legal system than Europe. From the EU itself: https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/seminars/20140703_gombos_speech_en.pdf https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/seminars/20140703_gom... > The main principles of EU law are equality before the law; legal certainty; predictable, clear and comprehensible legal provisions; and transparent legislation. 2 These principles can be upheld only if EU law has the same meaning in all language versions. “Open to interpretation” has nothing to do with the quote above. It doesn’t matter what the US has and what it does not. We’re not discussing the US here.
  • orra 3y ago
    > It doesn’t matter what US has and what it does not. We’re not discussing US here. When you claim the EU “has no idea” apropos nothing—simply for having a mechanism for interpreting statues in court—it is entirely reasonable to question your double standard. All major legal jurisdictions have courts to resolve things...
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    • rad_gruchalski 3y ago
      “Apropos nothing” added by yourself. Look - it doesn’t matter how the law is interpreted in the US because we’re not discussing the US here and the US is totally irrelevant to this discussion. This AI act, together with the CRA, are written by the people who, vast majority of them, never worked with software. Yet, they intend to regulate software. This will go wrong.