3 ms·
No, we're past that point. it's no longer the most useful way to describe these things, we need to understand that they already have some sort of "understanding
by stareatgoats 3y ago
No, we're past that point. it's no longer the most useful way to describe these things, we need to understand that they already have some sort of "understanding" which is very similar if not equal to what we understand by understanding.
Don't take my word for it, listen to Geoffrey Hinton explain it instead: https://youtu.be/qpoRO378qRY?t=1988 https://youtu.be/qpoRO378qRY?t=1988