3 ms·
Sure, and like I said, it's just a mitigation. The real answer is that if you're a high value target you just shouldn't use LLMs.
by phillipcarter 3y ago
Sure, and like I said, it's just a mitigation. The real answer is that if you're a high value target you just shouldn't use LLMs.
- pixl97 3y ago"I'm secure because I don't use an LLM" ... "What do you mean we got hacked via our third party vendor because they use LLMs"
- phillipcarter 3y agoI don't know why you're trying to argue, but I never said any of those things.
- pixl97 3y agoThis isn't wasn't an argument, it's an example played out now in 'standard' application security today. You're only secure as the vendors you build your software on, and that market factors are going to push all your vendors to use LLMs.
- noobermin 3y agoLike most things it's going to take casualities before people care, unfortunately. Remember this the next time a hype chaser trying to pin you down and sell you their latest ai product that you'll miss out on if you don't send them money in a few days.
- sysstemlord 3y agoEven better, don't use computers