3 ms·

> Most of us share the experience of having driven a car from A to B, without having any conscious recollection about the trip. From such experiences we can ded

> Most of us share the experience of having driven a car from A to B, without having any conscious recollection about the trip. From such experiences we can deduce that our level of consciousness is not constant, but it fluctuates. I’m not sure that I would characterize this as a ‘lack of consciousness’. Of all the times that I have experienced this, it’s because I was thinking deeply about something else (not lacking consciousness), and simply assigned a subroutine to the driving.

ljlolel 3y ago
This is accurate and not sure why you were downvoted
monktastic1 3y ago
Have you ever been reading a book, only to discover that your eyes are still scanning the page while your mind was doing something else? There's a particular flavor of "oops" as a certain capacity comes back online. Informally, you might call it "knowing what's happening in your field of experience." It can also be called metacognition. Meditation can reduce or eliminate these "oops" moments. It also shows you just how much more common that state is than you realize (or would likely even believe, due to a particular trick the mind plays). It really does feel like one had been sleepwalking through one's life up until that point. One certainly feels "more conscious" afterward.
kukkeliskuu 3y ago
Firstly, this is a very very difficult topic. Some ancients books have tried to communicate the same ideas I am trying to convey here, but have been less than succesful. There appears to be deep psychological reasons why these things are difficult to grasp. So I hope you will forgive me if I cannot fully convince you about my experiences. Actually, I am not trying to prove anything to you (or others) or say how people should think about consciousness. I am just sharing my experiences and what I have found based on them, so others can try out and see for themselves, so perhaps we could learn together more about these. Neuroscientist Rodolfo Llinas did an interesting experiment on himself, and explained it in an interview on Science Network about his book "I of the vortex". He was able to consistently turn his foot inwards by placing a strong magnet at certain position on his head. Then he decided he would move his foot outwards when the magnet was applied on the same spot. When he did this, his foot still moved inwards. His experience was that "I changed my mind". He was able to repeat this experiment many times, and each time he felt he had changed his mind. So he could not distinguish between really changing his mind and his body doing something and his mind making up a post-hoc rationalization for his body doing it. This story, as well as my experience of trying to understand my consciousness experimentally has led me to become very suspicious about my own memory and thoughts about my conscious experiences. And consequentially, about other people's thoughts and memory about their conscious experiences as well. So my question to you is, how would you know that 100% of the times you have had a similar experience, you were 100% of the time 100% focused in deeply thinking about something?

ljlolel 3y ago

This is accurate and not sure why you were downvoted

monktastic1 3y ago

Have you ever been reading a book, only to discover that your eyes are still scanning the page while your mind was doing something else? There's a particular flavor of "oops" as a certain capacity comes back online. Informally, you might call it "knowing what's happening in your field of experience." It can also be called metacognition. Meditation can reduce or eliminate these "oops" moments. It also shows you just how much more common that state is than you realize (or would likely even believe, due to a particular trick the mind plays). It really does feel like one had been sleepwalking through one's life up until that point. One certainly feels "more conscious" afterward.

kukkeliskuu 3y ago

Firstly, this is a very very difficult topic. Some ancients books have tried to communicate the same ideas I am trying to convey here, but have been less than succesful. There appears to be deep psychological reasons why these things are difficult to grasp. So I hope you will forgive me if I cannot fully convince you about my experiences. Actually, I am not trying to prove anything to you (or others) or say how people should think about consciousness. I am just sharing my experiences and what I have found based on them, so others can try out and see for themselves, so perhaps we could learn together more about these. Neuroscientist Rodolfo Llinas did an interesting experiment on himself, and explained it in an interview on Science Network about his book "I of the vortex". He was able to consistently turn his foot inwards by placing a strong magnet at certain position on his head. Then he decided he would move his foot outwards when the magnet was applied on the same spot. When he did this, his foot still moved inwards. His experience was that "I changed my mind". He was able to repeat this experiment many times, and each time he felt he had changed his mind. So he could not distinguish between really changing his mind and his body doing something and his mind making up a post-hoc rationalization for his body doing it. This story, as well as my experience of trying to understand my consciousness experimentally has led me to become very suspicious about my own memory and thoughts about my conscious experiences. And consequentially, about other people's thoughts and memory about their conscious experiences as well. So my question to you is, how would you know that 100% of the times you have had a similar experience, you were 100% of the time 100% focused in deeply thinking about something?