> To those who believe that new jobs will emerge at meaningful rates to absorb the losses and shocks, what exactly are those new jobs? This is a pretty disinge

> To those who believe that new jobs will emerge at meaningful rates to absorb the losses and shocks, what exactly are those new jobs? This is a pretty disingenuous question to ask, as the whole point of an innovation-driven market economy is that one cannot predict the future. It’s a question that we know for a fact no one can answer in general, so why should we consider it any kind of useful criticism of AI specifically?