> These are almost certainly hallucinated. You are almost certain of this based on the fact you can't think of a reason it would be done that way? > There's n

> These are almost certainly hallucinated. You are almost certain of this based on the fact you can't think of a reason it would be done that way? > There's no illumati stuff going on here, just people wanting it to be that way. What are you talking about? Even if these rules were not hallucinated, nobody is suggesting "illumati[sic] stuff" going on. What are you actually thinking the implications would be if it were true?