3 ms·
"Pay $20 for a month of ChatGPT-4. Play with it for a few minutes. " I do. And it is useful. "You’ll very quickly find that it is reasoning, not just regurgit
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"Pay $20 for a month of ChatGPT-4. Play with it for a few minutes. "
I do. And it is useful.
"You’ll very quickly find that it is reasoning, not just regurgitating training data. "
I just come to a different conclusion as it indeed fails for everything genuinely new I am asking it.
Common problems do work, even in new context. For example it can give me wgsl code, to do raycasts on predefined boxes and circles in a 2D context, even though it likely has not seen wgsl code that does this - but it has seen other code doing this and it has seen how to transpile glsl to wgsl. So you might already call this "reasoning", but I don't. With asking questions I can very quickly get to the limits of the "reasons" and "understanding" it has of the domain.