4 ms·
Then, if that's not accurate, take that entire process and repeat that 5 times, looking for the most common answer.
by QuadrupleA 3y ago
Then, if that's not accurate, take that entire process and repeat that 5 times, looking for the most common answer.
- jiggawatts 3y agoAnd then make sure to train GPT to help you trade stocks, because you’ll need those millions to pay your OpenAI bill.
- williamcotton 3y agoToo true… I can’t think of a time prior to this where I was spending $200/month researching the use of a new tool.
- washadjeffmad 3y agoDon't not do that, but also, a 30B with 70-80% of the reasoning of the latest GPT can be run on a home PC. Given that most people have computers and RAM is dirt cheap right now, I'm already maxing out all of my devices.
- williamcotton 3y agoAnd 5 of those, and the best answer… But it does seem like a single call to an LLM is not the correct approach. I’ve gotten the best results from attempting to mirror how I would operate in response to a prompt. Much of this is colored by decades of philosophical readings, which in my case means a decent amount of analytical philosophy along with latter Wittgenstein and other post linguistic turn thinkers. So when I break things down, either in some kind of approach inspired by Frege, Wittgenstein or unadorned self-reflection, I can see that the unconscious mind seems to be doing something recursive before my conscious mind is ready to start fumbling over the word. It seems like an LLM is just part of a larger cognitive architecture that will use these metacognitive approaches. It’s also very obvious that mammalian brains are much more efficient than GPUs.