5 ms·
> Where is Baltimore supposed to get the funding to meet this increase in demand for city services? That is for American politics to figure out. This is an Ame
by maeil 3y ago
> Where is Baltimore supposed to get the funding to meet this increase in demand for city services?
That is for American politics to figure out. This is an American political issue and blaming Korean car makers is absurd.
- matthewdgreen 3y agoOnce you’ve had a gun pointed at you from a car, taken down the license plate, then been told there’s nothing they can do because the car was stolen —- you’ll realize that car theft isn’t some individual problem. We’ve had the tech to solve this problem for decades, but car manufacturers decided to save a few bucks.
- zarzavat 3y agoThe easy accessibility of guns in America is not the fault of Korean car manufacturers either. What you describe is not something that people in most developed countries have to worry about.
- porkbeer 3y agoThe accessability of guns is not part of hotwiring kias, or even choosing to use them for crime. Gun ownership and crime are not strongly linked.
- soerxpso 3y agoThe tech to make it impossible to start a car without the owner's consent, even when the attacker has hardware access? Are you also selling magic beans and snake oil?
- jackvalentine 3y ago“We’ve had tech to solve this problem” isn’t the same statement as “tech to make it impossible to start a car without the owner’s consent, even when the attacker has hardware access”. Engine immobilisers cut out all the easy “jam a USB stick in there” attacks, The Kia Boys do not exist in Australia where they’ve been mandatory for 20 years. Lesson here for Americans - if you want something like this it has to be legislated. Cheap manufacturers will absolutely save a few bucks and not include it if they can.
- thewebcount 3y agoCase in point: My father was an EE at GM in the 70s. He told me one time that the company knew of a problem in some model from that era where when you made a hard left turn with the air conditioning on, the engine would stall. Fixing it would have increased the cost of each car by 15 cents, so they chose not to fix it. These models were later recalled. I don’t know whether the cost of the recall was more than the cost to have just done it right in the first place.
- porkbeer 3y agoIm a pretty big car nut, and GM is known for some sketchy stuff, but this is BS.
- ehnto 3y agoWhich is why many countries mandate immobilisers in cars. I have had my car stolen twice so this issue isn't distant from me, if it has become a state issue it needs a state solution. Individual responsibility seems to be the American preference though, on an individual level you have the ability to install an immobiliser, and being familiar with the car's features when you make such a massive purchase shouldn't be unreasonable.
- lostlogin 3y agoSo it’s the buyers fault. This is a darkly hilarious take.
- ehnto 3y agoWell it's no one persons fault, except the criminal obviously. But there are a few contributors, and I feel in the US's responsibility model defending your property is usually your job.
- lstodd 3y agoYeah, I had one with an immobiliser. By the third time it went nuts and blocked me from starting the car it took me about 3 minutes to reset it, and the tools were already kept in the trunk for just this. Now I live in a country where it's normal to leave cars with open windows and even doors in the street so that they don't overheat in the sun. Sometimes even with keys dangling. No immobilisers necessary -- only decent people are.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Ekaros 3y agoCouldn't a car be stolen also by pointing gun at the owner? The problem is the people the citizens that do these crimes. Not the technical implementations of vehicles.
- matthewdgreen 3y agoThey can but this one was not. It was taken from in front of a nearby house while the owner slept.
- maeil 3y agoThe fact that this phenomenon is only really seen in the US is enough on its own to conclude that this is an American political or social problem.
- KennyBlanken 3y agoThey have to include the anti-theft systems in the vast majority of other countries. They made the conscious choice to save a few dollars per car not including it in US models...with predictable impact on US society...because it wasn't required here. Because car companies have fought legislation to mandate it, via lobbyists. How would you feel if in the rest of the world kids pajamas were made of fabric that didn't burn easily / melt onto skin, but in the US due to lax regulation, companies were making them out of cheaper fabric that is practically tinder and easily melts to the skin, but slightly cheaper? Would you still bleat about how it's "American politics" and not reprehensible, immoral cost-cutting?
- maeil 3y ago> How would you feel if in the rest of the world kids pajamas were made of fabric that didn't burn easily / melt onto skin, but in the US due to lax regulation, companies were making them out of cheaper fabric that is practically tinder and easily melts to the skin, but slightly cheaper? This kind of thing is standard practice in almost every industry. Products are generally manufactured according to safety standards that are required in the country of sale. This is especially prevalent in cars. Things like airbags, crumple zones, even seatbelts. Plenty of countries where cars are sold without backseat seatbelts. Id also be genuinely interested in a source for your claim of immobilizers being required in the "vast majority" of other countries as my Google skills are failing to find it. Furthermore, in the other countries where one is not required, has this ommission led to the same "predictable impacts on society" there?
- pb7 3y agoInterestingly, isn't this exactly what happens when American tech companies get fined and/or are forced to implement certain regulations in Europe?
- jasonm23 3y agoAre European regulations due to people stealing tech devices? I thought it was due to anti-consumer practices.
- brokencode 3y agoSo making cars that lack basic anti-theft features common in other brands of cars doesn’t count as anti-consumer?
- jasonm23 3y agoNo, not if it's not hidden away from the customer and deceptive.
- pb7 3y agoNot including anti-theft devices that they include in other countries that mandate them is pretty anti-consumer. In this case, it's also extremely costly and dangerous unlike something like not saving website cookies.
- jasonm23 3y agoIt really depends on how the car is marketed, no?