> This has nothing to do with ChatGPT and everything to do with Amazon tolerating counterfeits and plagiarism. How can you say that it's got nothing to do with

> This has nothing to do with ChatGPT and everything to do with Amazon tolerating counterfeits and plagiarism. How can you say that it's got nothing to do with ChatGPT and it is a counterfeit or plagiarized work? I'm not squaring the circle here. Do you believe he didn't produce the counterfeit or plagiarized work using ChatGPT after all? Perhaps you're saying ChatGPT is just a tool, which would be fair enough, but we frequently condemn toolmakers for enabling criminal behavior: gun manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies producing opioids, etc. I see in the news today that the city of Baltimore is even suing some car manufacturers for enabling auto theft by not having enough anti-theft precautions. In that light, wouldn't you say that ChatGPT at least makes it easier to produce counterfeit or plagiarized works, and that even if they are not legally culpable, they are in some sense enabling behavior that would not happen otherwise?