4 ms·

How do you trust anyone after GPT4? You can't tell how much they relied on the model. And maybe some things AI does are good - it could generate writing style i

How do you trust anyone after GPT4? You can't tell how much they relied on the model. And maybe some things AI does are good - it could generate writing style improvement advice, counterpoints to your ideas, help find mistakes, help with formatting complex math, etc.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
hammyhavoc 3y ago
Depends on the industry. ChatGPT output is horrendous on a lot of technical topics. Equally, whether a thought is something new and novel, and even demonstrating/documenting something new or interesting.
- BiteCode_dev 3y ago
  It's also not great at providing an entertaining style, give you context, make sure you have per-requisite, double checking there is not error in what it gives you, etc. But this will change in the future, so I would say those are temporary advantages for us only.
BiteCode_dev 3y ago
Ultimately, it's a big problems for readers, but it's great for writers. Once a reader has validated a writer (you like the style, the context helps you and proved to have high value), your attachment to the author is even higher than before, because the cost of finding anything else of equal quality is skyrocketing. I've been given a lot of attention to find the right fruit and vegetable provider for years since we have abundance but most of it taste like crap. I'm extremely loyal to the farmers I buy from, and I buy at a premium from them. Despite the fact I'm always trying to find new ones, it's very rare I do. It will be the same with writers. Even if GPT starts to include my articles in it's training data set, I can still provide a lot of value with tooling, contextualization, integration, coming up with something new, etc. To me, GPT is only making my work shine even more. And it helps me tremendously when I code, so I just love it.

4 ms·

How do you trust anyone after GPT4? You can't tell how much they relied on the model. And maybe some things AI does are good - it could generate writing style i

by visarga 3y ago

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
hammyhavoc 3y ago
Depends on the industry. ChatGPT output is horrendous on a lot of technical topics. Equally, whether a thought is something new and novel, and even demonstrating/documenting something new or interesting.
- BiteCode_dev 3y ago
  It's also not great at providing an entertaining style, give you context, make sure you have per-requisite, double checking there is not error in what it gives you, etc. But this will change in the future, so I would say those are temporary advantages for us only.
BiteCode_dev 3y ago
Ultimately, it's a big problems for readers, but it's great for writers. Once a reader has validated a writer (you like the style, the context helps you and proved to have high value), your attachment to the author is even higher than before, because the cost of finding anything else of equal quality is skyrocketing. I've been given a lot of attention to find the right fruit and vegetable provider for years since we have abundance but most of it taste like crap. I'm extremely loyal to the farmers I buy from, and I buy at a premium from them. Despite the fact I'm always trying to find new ones, it's very rare I do. It will be the same with writers. Even if GPT starts to include my articles in it's training data set, I can still provide a lot of value with tooling, contextualization, integration, coming up with something new, etc. To me, GPT is only making my work shine even more. And it helps me tremendously when I code, so I just love it.