3 ms·
Or at the very least, fact-checked by a human.
by euroderf 4y ago
Or at the very least, fact-checked by a human.
- ta1243 4y agoHow would "fact checking" work. Can you establish a train of trust that all such sources were human all the way down, let alone accurate?
- euroderf 4y agoThat is a technical challenge for the 21st century. Much more difficult than establishing the provenance of physical goods. But short of that, I was replying to "I'll pay extra for a guarantee (somehow, this is your value proposition) that it was written by a human without the help of generative AI." So yes, I guess that is orthogonal to fact-checking.
- Kerrick 4y agoThe Society of Professional Journalists and other news organizations have set a standard that should be the absolute minimum. For example: - https://www.journaliststoolbox.org/2023/05/12/urban_legendsfact-checking/ https://www.journaliststoolbox.org/2023/05/12/urban_legendsf... - https://verificationhandbook.com/ https://verificationhandbook.com/ - https://mediashift.org/2015/02/journalism-professors-should-teach-accuracy-checklists/ https://mediashift.org/2015/02/journalism-professors-should-...
- medstrom 4y agoFrom the third link: > ... the checklist is the most effective system of preventing errors, so effective that pilots and surgeons use checklists routinely when they fly and operate. (When I had a recent biopsy, I noticed the surgeon and nurses clearly following checklists as they confirmed the site for the procedure before anesthetizing me, checked my identification bracelet and asked my name and date of birth.) Suddenly I'm picturing a new world in which we knowledge workers all have our own personal wikis and carefully go through a checklist for all new info we add to it. Not only "is this AI?" but a general sanity check too.
- pdntspa 4y agoI don't think its good to settle for a compromise here. Either 100% organic or not.
- SoftTalker 4y agoThere will be way too much sewage coming out of the pipe to be fact checked by humans.