4 ms·
It seems like you're the negative one here. There is nothing inherently negative about living longer - just potential to have learned far more than others from
by chaxor 3y ago
It seems like you're the negative one here. There is nothing inherently negative about living longer - just potential to have learned far more than others from experience. Any biological issues with existing for longer can have solutions, for which may be tackled better with more good minds put forth to the task.
- yieldcrv 3y agonah, people just choose not to read what I wrote but it is illuminating to see a passionate audience’s reading comprehension ability it says treatments and extending life is desirable and doesn't need a reason and the reason presented would be a waste of energy to debate and quantify while doing so isnt even necessary, read it again until it makes sense that way
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- spandrew 3y agoThat, or what you said was being a jerk and you got called out on it.
- yieldcrv 3y agoand of the accuracy of the statement?
- t-writescode 3y agoI downvoted you for this part, fwiw: > more elderly humans will probably be a net negative
- yieldcrv 3y ago[flagged]
- uvudshcg 3y agoYou’re asserting that “more elderly people is a net negative” without giving a supporting argument. So, I think all the prayer above you is saying they disagree. And without you making the effort to support your kind of inflammatory statement… it seems perfectly reasonable to me that they would not support there point other than to say they disagree.
- yieldcrv 3y agoand my only reason for that assertion is because the opposite assertion was not quantified either. I wrote “probably” as in “just as probably” it was to point out the equal likelihood, and the unnecessary aspect of bothering