I’m sympathetic to these arguments, but AGI to me is Data from Star Trek. I think most people would agree. He has curiosity. The current gen of AIs don’t. They

I’m sympathetic to these arguments, but AGI to me is Data from Star Trek. I think most people would agree. He has curiosity. The current gen of AIs don’t. They don’t even ask questions, let alone remember anything. He has a capacity to get bored. He tries out guitar just because he wants to. He paints. He’s frustrated when the details aren’t right. A lot of these traits are human. But that’s the whole point — we’re trying to make a wo/man in a machine. I’ve never understood the hype, and I’m a researcher. It seems to me that there is a vast gulf between what AIs are capable of and anything that makes being human, human. I believe they’ll get progressively better at intellectual tasks, though. That will be really disruptive.