3 ms·
One argument I heard at some point is that google is better of if people who don't click ads use ad-block. If you care enough that you install ad-blockers you
by DanielHB 3y ago
One argument I heard at some point is that google is better of if people who don't click ads use ad-block.
If you care enough that you install ad-blockers you will not click on any ads anyway. If they block ad-block then their click-per-view metrics will go down which looks bad to advertisers and makes ad spots sell for less
Of course that is a very simple view of a very complex problem, but there is definitely some merit to it. For example ad-block these days has been normalised enough that too many people do it, even people that would click some ads. Also, specifically for youtube, by allowing ad-block you reduce the value of youtube premium (which is not true for google search for example, there is no google search premium)
- bagacrap 3y agoDefinitely Google is better off serving exactly the ads a user will click, including no ads for the user who will never ever click any ad, even one from their favorite sneaker brand. But I think a lot fewer people are actually in the never ever camp than they think. And even though I know I click ads on occasion, I still run an ad blocker.
- HWR_14 3y agoAre we including accidental clicks in the "never click ads" demographic?